Adopting and Adapting Syllabi by Instructors of English Language Departments at University Level: An Applied Study

Kozhin Omer Ismael Hama

University of Sulaimani/College of Basic Education

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.8.5.16

Keywords: adopting and adapting syllabus, course book, instructors


Abstract

Syllabus is a crucial instructional resource that assists educators with clarification and simplification of subjects and sheds light on the content of a course of study, step by step. It is a crucial aspect of university teaching to provide syllabi for all their offered modules; thus, every instructor requires one to teach a class properly. Instructors, however, always use syllabi to improve their performance and make their teaching better suit students’ needs to learn and gather information to enhance their university education. This study examines how instructors deal with syllabi in terms of designing, adopting and adapting or only adopting them. It; therefore, sheds light on instructor’s expertise in curriculum design in general and the process of syllabus creation and adoption especially. Therefore, eighteen (18) university instructors from the University of Sulaimani and Komar University of Science and Technology have been chosen to answer a questionnaire of six (6) main questions and two (2) sub-questions on syllabus design and adoption. The results show that most of the instructors are unaware of the needed procedures for both designing and adapting previously designed syllabi by experts. Moreover, they do not always take environment analysis into consideration as much as they care about students’ needs when making adjustments to the syllabi that they adopt. Eventually, the study sums up with conclusions and recommendations.


References

• Irfani, B. (2017). Syllabus design for English courses. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 6(1), 21-41.

• Johnson, K. (1977). The adoption of functional syllabuses for general language teaching courses. Canadian Modern Language Review, 33(5), 667-680.

• K O, T., & A M, A. (2023). Investigating principles and models of curriculum development in some Iraqi Kurdistan Regional Universities through teachers' point of view. Journal of Language Studies, 5, 123-141. https://doi.org/10.25130/jls.6.2.10

• Marand, E. S. (2011). Adoption, adaptation, and development of language instructional units. European Journal of Social Sciences, 22(4), 550-555.

• O’Neill, R. (1982). Why use textbooks? ELT Journal, 36(2). Oxford University Press.

• Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2009). Language curriculum design. Routledge.

• Richards, J. (2001). Curriculum development in language education. Cambridge University Press.

• Saul, M. (2018). Questionnaire: Definition, examples, design and types. Simply Psychology. Retrieved March 18, 2020, from https://www.simplypsychology.org/questionnaire.html

• Skierso, A. (1991). Textbook selection and adaptation. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Newbury House.

• Tabari, A. G. (2013). Challenges of language syllabus design in EFL/ESL contexts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4), 869.

• Tomlinson, B. (2003). Developing principled frameworks for material development. In B. (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 107-129). London: Continuum.

• Widdowson, H. G. (1984). Educational and pedagogic factors in syllabus design. In C. Brumfit (Ed.), Language and literature teaching: From practice to principle (pp. 23-28). Pergamon.

• Willis, D. (2000). Syllabus and materials: Open distance learning postgraduate programmes. The Centre for English Language Studies, The University of Birmingham.

• Zohrabi, M. (2011). Course book development and evaluation for English for general purposes course. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 214.

• Zohrabi, M. (2011, June). Course book development and evaluation for English for general purposes course. ERIC - EJ1080740. Retrieved March 24, 2022, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1080740

• Online sources:

• Evaluating and Adapting Textbooks. (n.d.). In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing materials for language teaching. A&C Black. Retrieved March 2, 2021, from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/29426837/Unit-14-Evaluating-and-Adapting-Textbooks

• Retrospective evaluation of ELT course book effectiveness - CORE Reader. (n.d.). Retrospective evaluation of ELT course book effectiveness - CORE Reader; core.ac.uk. Retrieved March 19, 2022, from https://core.ac.uk/reader/132193025

• Syllabus vs Curriculum. (2021, October 16). Leverage Edu. Retrieved from https://leverageedu.com/blog/syllabus-vs-curriculum/#:~:text=The%20curriculum%20contains%20the%20overall,discipline%20under%20that%20particular%20course