The Effect of (DRTA) Strategy on Iraqi EFL Students' Text Comprehension Achievement

Maqbola Mohammed Rajab

General Directorate of Salahudin Education/ AL-Dour Education Department

Nagham Qadoory Yahya

University of Tikrit / College of Education for Human Science /Department of English

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/lang.7.3.20

Keywords: Direct Reading Thinking Activity Strategy, reading comprehension


Abstract

This study aims at finding out the effect of Direct Reading Thinking Activity(DRTA) on EFL students' achievement in reading comprehension (RC). To achieve the aim of the study, a quasi-experimental nonrandomized control group, pretest-posttest design is employed. Two groups are randomly selected from the fifth preparatory grade in AL-Dour Preparatory School for Boys for the academic year (2021-2022) to represent the sample of the study which conclude (75) students. The two groups (each group consists of 30 students) are submitted to the same pretest in RC to ensure equivalence among groups. Then the first group is taught according to(DRTA) strategy, whereas the first group is taught according to (DRTA) strategy and the second is taught according to the conventional method. After achieving the validity of the test, a pilot study is conducted to (50) students of the fifth preparatory stage /AL-Kastal Preparatory School for Boys. Then the two groups are subjected to the same achievement post-test in RC. The data are analyzed statistically by using ANOVA. The results suggest that there are statistically significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in achievement post-tests of RC, in favor of the experimental group. The results also show that the second group taught according to (DRTA) strategy is better than the first group taught according to conventional method.


References

- AL-Soufi, N.(2017). The Effect of Reciprocal Teaching Strategy on Developing Yemeni Secondary Stage Students' EFL Reading Comprehension Skills and Self-efficacy, ph. D. Faculty of Education, Mansoura University.

-Brown, H. Douglas . 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (2nd Ed.). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

-Burns, P.C., B.D., & Ross, E.P.(1996). Teaching Reading in Today's Elementary School.( Sixth Edition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

- Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice Hall Regents.

-Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA). (2015) Reading Rockets, Available at: http://www.reading rockets.org/strategies/shared - reading.

-Droff, A.(1988:33). Teaching English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

-Djiwandono and Soenardi, M. (1996) Tes Bahasa dalam Pengajaran. In FPBS-IKIP.

-Dubin, F., and Bycina, D. (1991) " Models of the Process of Reading". Celce- Murcia(ed.), Teaching English as a Foreign Language, 20-3.

- EL- Koumy, A.,A. (2006). The Effects of the Directed Reading -thinking Activity on EFL Students' Referential and inferential Comprehension. Full professor Curriculum and Instruction of English as a Foreign Language at Suez Canal University Egypt.

- Eyseneck, M. W. and Flanagan, N. (2000). Psychology for Advanced Level. New York: Psychology Press Ltd.

-Grellet, F. 1996. Developing Reading Skills : A practical guide to reading http://www.nea.org/tools/directe Process. New York: -Harper & Reading Maturity as A Cognitive retrieved on Monday, 20 Row. (Online).Available: September 2016.

- Goodman, K.S. (1973). "Psycholinguistic Universal of Reading Process ." In Smith .F,(Ed) Psycholinguistic and Reading . New York : Holt ,Rinehart and Winston(21-29).

-Harrys, J. A & Edward, R. S. 1995. How to Increase Reading Ability. New York: Longman.

- Henning, G. (1987). A Guide to Language Testing: Development, Evaluation, Research. Cambridge: Newbury House Publishers.

- Isaac, S and Michael, W. (1977). Handbook in Research and Evaluation. New York: Robert R. Knapp.

-Jennings, C. and Shepherd, J. (1998). Literacy and the Key Learning Areas: Successful Classroom Strategies. Australia: Eleanor Curtain Publishing.

-Kamhi, A. & Catts, H. (2008). The language basis of reading: Implications of classification and treatment of children with reading disabilities. In Bulter, K.& Silliman, E. (Eds.) Speaking, Reading, and Writing in Children with Language and Learning Disabilities: New Paradigms in Research and Practice.

-Neufeld, Paul. 2005. “Comprehension Instruction in Content Area Classes”. International Reading Association, 59, 4, p. 302-312.

-Nunan, D.(1991) "Methods in Second Language Classroom- Oriented Research: A Critical Review". Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 249-274.

-Richards, Jack C. and Richard Schmidt. 2002. Longman, Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (3rd Ed.). London: Pearson Education Limited.

- Richardson, J. S., Morgan, R. S., and Fleener, C, (2009), Reading to Learn in the Content Areas, USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, p. 108-109.

-Santi Eriliana (2011). Improving Reading Comprehension, through Directed Reading -Thinking Activity strategy. Islamic State College of Palangka Raya. Safierliana @ yahoo. Com. March 2011. Journal English foreign a -он as Language 1(1):49. DOI: 10.23971 / jeft. V2 : 1.36.

-Stauffer, R. G. (1969). Directing comprehension exercises. Cambridge University Press d-reading-thinking-activity.html.

-Tierney, R., Readence, J. and Dishner, E. (1995). Reading Strategies and Practices. Needham Heights, MA: Simon and Schuster Company.

- Valette, R. M. (1967). Modern Language Testing. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World Inc.

- Wiersma , W.; and Jure, S., G.(2005). Research Method in Education: A Introduction . (9th Ed). Published by Pearson Education, Inc.

- Westwood, Peter.2008. What Teachers Need to Know about Reading and Writing Difficulties. Victoria: ACER Press.

-Youssef, O. (1988). The Effect of Two Schema-Based Strategies. on Egyptian High School Students' Comprehension of EFL, The Faculty of The Graduate School in Partial fulfillment of the Requirements. A Dissertation. Indian. University.