The Jury as Lawmaker: Legal Realism and Deliberation in Reginald Rose’s Twelve Angry Men
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.9.3.P2.15Keywords:
Bias, Juror, Law, Legal Practitioner, Legal Realism, Realist, Twelve Angry MenAbstract
This paper examines Twelve Angry Men (1954) by Reginald Rose through the lens of Legal Realism. It focuses on the play’s significant critique of legal formalism and advocates for legal adaptation to real social realities. It aims to examine the portrayal of justice in the play and how the events and characters align with the thought that different factors shape law. It demonstrates how the play contributes to contemporary debates on justice and reform in the legal system. Karl Llewellyn’s theory of Legal Realism is central to understanding events in a jury room, which consists of twelve jurors. The play illustrates how a legal realist perspective, particularly in criminal cases, is more closely tied to real-world issues than it is to abstract theoretical concepts. Legal Realism challenges the rigidity of the legal system and advocates for a dynamic one that evolves in response to societal needs. The results show how the play exemplifies the critique of traditional assumptions and advocates for reforms that acknowledge the law's ethical and social dimensions, ensuring that justice is not a theoretical ideal but an attainable reality.
References
Abdul Hameed, M. K. (2019). The concepts of feminine, slavery, and discrimination by Maya Angelou. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 26(9), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.26.9.2019.25
Alhgam, Y. (2025). Shelley’s ideals and political justice; The Mask of Anarchy as an example. Journal of the College of Languages (JCL), 51, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.36586/jcl.2.2025.0.51.0163
Al-khazaali, M. H. (2022). The revenge of conscience in John Grisham’s A Time to Kill: Psychoanalytic study. Al-Adab Journal, 1(141), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i141.3692
Angelosanto, M. (2023). Legal realism and the predictability of judicial decisions. Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics, 2(3), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.isslp.2.3.2
Bandes, S. A., & Blumenthal, J. A. (2012). Emotion and the law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105018
Berryessa, C. M., Kraft, T. J., & Ward, G. (2022). Editorial: Social psychological process and effects on the law. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 990167. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.990167
Dajović, G. (2023). Hartʼs judicial discretion revisited. Revus: Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law, 50. https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.9735
Dawood, A.-K. (2009). Legal register. Journal of the College of Languages (JCL), 19, 20–28. https://www.jcolang.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/JCL/article/view/433
Edlin, D. E. (2016). Common law judging: Subjectivity, impartiality, and the making of law. University of Michigan Press.
Hussein, H. (2022). The possibility of truth and justice in Ariel’s Death and the Maiden. Alustath Journal for Human and Social Sciences, 61(3), 577–587. https://doi.org/10.36473/ujhss.v61i3.1774
Kadhim, Z. J., & Sulaiman, M. Q. (2025). Moral reasoning in Ann Cleeves’ Raven Black. Journal of Language Studies, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.9.1.11
Llewellyn, K. (1930). A realistic jurisprudence—The next step. Columbia Law Review, 30(4), 431–465.
Matczak, M. (2018). Why judicial formalism is incompatible with the rule of law. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 31(2), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2831477
Posner, R. A. (1986). Legal formalism, legal realism, and the interpretation of statutes and the Constitution. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 37(2), 179–217. https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol37/iss2/3
Rose, R., & Sergel, S. L. (n.d.). Twelve angry men: A play in three acts. The Dramatic Publishing Company.
Rosenzweig, P. (2021). Reginald Rose and the journey of 12 Angry Men. Fordham University Press.
Sales, B. D., & Krauss, D. A. (2015). The psychology of law: Human behavior, legal institutions, and law. American Psychological Association.
Shaffer, G. (2018). Legal realism and international law. Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 2018-55. University of California, Irvine - School of Law.
Tonkov, D. (2019). Experience and reason in American legal realism. In The experience of law: Collection of articles and essays (The Library of the International Journal “Philosophy of Law Issues”). Kharkiv: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ISL RAS).
