Suggesting an Agency–Based Cubic Strategy and Exploring its Effect on EFL Iraqi University Female Students’ Agency for Learning

Authors

  • Sandy Basim Kareem University of Baghdad
  • Shaima Mahdi Salh University of Baghdad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.9.3.P2.12

Abstract

The study aims to suggest a strategy named (Agency–Based Cubic Strategy) based on learner agency theory. And exploring its effect on students' agency for learning (autonomy, motivation, and self-efficacy). The sample of this experimental quantitative study consists of 98 Third-year EFL university students in the College of Education for Women\ University of Baghdad during the 2024-2025 academic year. To achieve the aims of this study, a Likert-scale questionnaire of 28 items based on Code (2020). The data has been analyzed using SPSS. This study proposes an agency-based cube strategy and examines its impact on agency in learning among Iraqi female university students learning a foreign language. The research aims to enhance students’ autonomy, motivation, and engagement by incorporating a structured approach that promotes decision-making, self-regulation, and interactive learning. The results indicate that implementing the cube strategy significantly improved students’ sense of agency, leading to increased engagement, confidence, and language proficiency. The study concludes that incorporating agency-based strategies can contribute to more effective and empowering learning experiences in English as a foreign language.

References

Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–139. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109

Ahmed, H. H., & Alwan, S. T. (2019). Academic buoyancy of high school students at the distinguished schools. Journal of the College of Education for Women, 29(6), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.36231/s6az3s48

Alderson, C. (1995). Dictionary of language testing. Cambridge University Press.

Alsaadi, S., & Mahdi, S. (2013). The effect of a mediator on scaffolding EFL student-teachers' teaching competencies, self-efficacy and self-awareness. Journal of the College of Education for Women, 24(4), 1272–1295.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 154–196). Guilford Press.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x

Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Pearson Education.

Carman, M. K. (2019). Using Quizlet to enhance learner agency and self-efficacy in EFL. In Teacher efficacy, learner agency (pp. 516–525). JALT.

Code, J. (2020). Agency for learning: Intention, motivation, self-efficacy, and self-regulation. Frontiers in Education, 5, 19. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00019

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

García-Martín, J., & García-Sánchez, J. N. (2020). The effectiveness of four instructional approaches used in a MOOC promoting personal skills for success in life. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 25(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2019.08.001

Liao, P. C. (2019). Understanding EFL learner agency in collaborative activities: A case study in a Taiwanese English course. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(3), 768–789. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.3.7.768

Marín, V. I., de Benito, B., & Darder, A. (2024). Technology-enhanced learning for student agency in higher education: A systematic literature review. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal - IxD&A, 2020(45), 15–49.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic Press.

Richmond, A. (2022). Students' learning well-being in an innovative learning environment (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Waikato).

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.

Saalh, S. M., & Kadhim, S. H. (2020). The EFL students' academic buoyancy in reading and listening skills. Asian EFL Journal, 27(4.4), 226–253.

Teng, M. F. (2018). Autonomy, agency, and identity in teaching and learning English as a foreign language. Springer. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com

Van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 163–186). Equinox Publishing Ltd.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Kareem, S. B., & Salh, S. M. (2025). Suggesting an Agency–Based Cubic Strategy and Exploring its Effect on EFL Iraqi University Female Students’ Agency for Learning. JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE STUDIES, 9(3, Part 2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.9.3.P2.12