The Turkmen Language Survival in the City of Erbil: A Sociolinguistic Study
Sangar Othman Ibrahim
Department of English, College of Languages, Salahaddin University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.8.4.10
Keywords: Turkmen language, Definitions of Minority Language, Ethnic Minority, and The Future of Minority Languages
Abstract
The main aim of the current study is to shed light on the current status of the Turkmen language in the city of Erbil. The main research questions for the current study are: Is the Turkmen language in any danger of extinction in Erbil? Does the Kurdistan Regional Government have any role in surviving the Turkmen language as an ethnic minority language in Erbil? The Turkmen language in Erbil is believed to be safe from extinction as Turkmen people use it in daily life without facing political or social issues. In order to obtain data, an open-ended survey is used involving 60 Turkmen teachers and instructors at Turkmen Atabag primary and secondary school for girls, Fuzuli primary and secondary coeducational school, Oghuzkhan primary and secondary school for boys, Gharibi high school for girls, Imaddadin high school for boys, and the Turkish Department at Salahaddin University/ College of Languages. For analysing the achieved data, the researcher used a mixed methods research approach, encompassing both quantitative and qualitative methods. The researcher follows the work of Mühlhäusler (1992) as an adopted model. The current study concludes that the Turkmen language is not in any danger at all in the city of Erbil. Moreover, the Kurdistan Regional Government plays a great role in surviving the Turkmen language in the city of Erbil.
References
Al-Abassy, M. 2009. Iraqi Turkmen. Beirut: Free Word House Press.
Al-Arbili, H., D., Kh. 2020. The Detailed History of Erbil: The Story of the City till the Settlement of the Problem of Mousl in 1926. Tafsir Press.
Askari, Kh., A. and Sharif, K., M. 1995. Turkmen Iranians: Anthropological and Demographic Study. Tehran, Iran: Asatir Publications.
Austin, P., K. and Sallabank, J. 2011. The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Box, Ch. 2019. The Effects of Institutional Support of Endangered Languages on Language Ideologies. The Pegasus Review: UCF Undergraduate Research Journal, 10 (2), pp. 1-20.
Capotorti, F. 1979. Study on the Rights of Persons Belonging to Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities. New York: United Nations.
Clyne, M. 2001. 'Can the shift from immigrant language be reversed in Australia?'. In Joshua Fishman (ed.), Can threatened languages be saved? Reversing language shift: A 21stcentury perspective, 364-389. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Demirci, F. 1991. The Iraqi Turks Yesterday and Today. Turkey, Ankara: Turkish Historical Society Printing Press.
Fenyvesi A. 2015. Multilingualism and minority language use in the digital sphere: the digital use of language as a new domain of language use. In: Linguistic and cultural diversity in cyberspace. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference (Yakutsk, Russian Federation, 30 June – 3 July, 2014). Moscow: Interregional Library Cooperation Centre. Pp. 126-131.
Fraenkel, J., R, Wallen, N., E., and Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and Evaluate research in education. 8th Ed. USA: New York.
Grenoble, L. and Singerman, A., R. Minority Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grenoble, L., A. and Whaley, L. J. (2006) Saving Languages: An Introduction to Language Revitalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hinton, 2001. L. Language revitalization: an overview. In Hinton, L. & Hale, K. The Green Book of Language Revitalization in Practice, pp. 3-18. Academic Press, San Diego.
Jorgensen, P. 2016. Türkçe! The Turkish Language is Fascinating. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJRQRD6LAmY&t=180s. [Accessed 25 August, 2023].
Kwak, S. 2023. Are only p-values less than 0.05 significant? A p-value greater than 0.05 is also significant! Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis,12 (2), pp. 89-95.
Mühlhäusler, P. 1992. Preserving Languages or Language Ecologies? A Top-down Approach to Language Survival. Oceanic Linguistics, 13 (2), pp. 163-180.
Nettle, D. and Romaine, S 2000. Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World’s Languages. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Nur, T, Lukman, Kaharuddin and Dafirah. 2021. Language Attitudes of Betawi Teenagers toward their Mother Tongue: A Sociolinguistic Perspective. TESOL International Journal, 10 (1), pp. 102-118.
Petkova, B. 2019. Ethnicity, Ethnic Minority vs. Ethnic Majority. Available from: https://www.young-adulllt.eu/glossary/detail.php?we_objectID=195.[Accessed 20 August 2023].
Qamry, T., Z. 2006. ‘Language Use, Language Preference and Language Attitudes in Language Contact Situation: A Sociolinguistic Survey of the Minority Languages in Jharkhand’, PhD dissertation, Aligarh Muslim University: India.
Ridanpää, J. 2018. Why save a minority language? Meänkieli and rationales of language revitalization. Fennia 196(2) , pp. 187–203.
Shalom, T., O. 2015. Globalization and the Survival of Minority Languages: The Case of the Ogu Language. Journal of the Linguistic Association of Nigeria. 18, pp. 95-109.
Tosi, A., 2007. Language survival and language death in multilingual Italy. In Ecology of Language, 10, pp. 113-123.
Tsunoda, T. 2006 Language Endangerment and Language Revitalization: An Introduction. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.
