JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE STUDIES

Natural Phonology: Natural Classes and Processes

Sua'ad Abd Ar-Rahman Eltaif

Ministry of Education/General Directorate of Education in Salah Alddin/Department of Tikrit Education

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/lang.7.3.14

Keywords: Natural Phonology, Natural Classes, Processes, Theory, Phonemes

---

Abstract

Natural phonology is a linguistic theory developed by David Stampe and Patricia Donegan that seeks to explain the phonological patterns observed in human languages. The phonological processes are seen as natural and regular reactions to the limitations of the human vocal and auditory system. A natural class refers to a combination of segments which tend to behave similarly because they have features in common. The problem of this study is that NP heavily depends on theoretical arguments and introspection rather than empirical data. Only limited rules can categorize the natural classes and apply to features. This research aims at identifying the gist of the theory of natural phonology, clarifying its principles and processes. This study hypothesizes that there are no regular processes and there are phonological variation across languages. The model adopted of this study is Donegan and Stampe 1979. This study concludes that NP supposes that the samples of speech are governed by innate and universal set of phonological processes.

---

References

-Bharati, S. (2012) General and English Linguistics. School of Distance Education. The English and Foreign Languages University -Hyderabad. India. (p. 4-26) .

Bruck, Anthony. Robert A. Fox and Michael W La Galy. (Ed.) Natural Phonology. 1974. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society (page 25).

-Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics.6th. ed. Oxford: Black well Publishing.

-Donegan, P., Stampe, D. (1979). The study of Natural Phonology. In: Dinnsen, D.A. (ed.). Current Approaches to Phonological Theory. Bloomington: IUP, 126-173.

-Donegan, P. Stampe, D. (2009) Hypotheses of Natural Phonology. University of Hawi i of Mӓnoa.

-Donegan, P. (2002). Phonological processes and phonetic rules. In: Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., Weckwerth, J. (eds.). Future Challenges for Natural Linguistics . Muenchen: Lincom Europa, 57-82.

-Flemming, E. (2015) .Deriving Natural Classes in Phonology. Stanford University.

-Hayes, B. (2009) Introductory Phonology. Willy –Blackwell. (p.75- 76).

-Hytelstam, K.(1987). ''Markedness , language universals typology and second language acquisition''. Cambridge Mass :Newbury House.

-Katamba, F. (1989). An Introduction to phonology. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing, New York.

-Lahrch, Z.& Youbi , S. (2015). Natural Phonology and Strength Hierarchy.

-McCarthy,J.J., (2002). Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

-Na than, Geoffery ,S.(1982). Natural Phonology Interferences in Second Language Acquisition. Chicago.

- Nathan, G and P. Donegan (2011). Natural Phonology and Sound Change.

-Roussou,A. (2016) .Markedness , Complexity, and Naturalness. University of Patras.

-Szczegielniak, A. (2006) Introduction to Linguistic Theory. Phonology: The Sound Patterns of Language. Copyright in part : cengage learning.

- Stampe, D. (1969) The Acquisition of Phonetic Representation. CLS,5.

- Stampe, D. (1973). A Dissertation on Natural Phonology. Bloomington: IULC.

- Tobin, Y. (2009). Comparing and Contrasting Natural Phonology, Optimality Theory and the Theory of Phonology as Human Behaviour. Gurion University of the Negev, Be 'er Sheva.

-Wojcik, R. 1981. "Natural Phonology and generative phonology". In: D. Goyvaerts (ed.) Phonology in the 1980s. Ghent: Story-Scientia, 635-647.