Grammarians and linguists have been accustomed to issuing and issuing grammatical rulings that are abundant in their books and writings. These rulings have even gone beyond books that combine language and literature. The purpose of adopting these responses is to give preference to the most correct responses and statements through discussions and objections that they have agreed upon with the term responses. These responses are based on different points of view, which are an important factor in enriching the grammatical and linguistic lesson. Through it, the value of the language, its structural and stylistic beauty, the breadth and flexibility of its uses, and the multiplicity of its aspects are known through grammatical objections and responses. The research is based on isolating the statements of grammarians and linguists who differ in their points of view and studying the objections between them, which we find in books of language and literature, in contrast to the books in which responses are known between linguists and grammarians, such as Al-Kamil in Language and Literature and Ibn Al-Shajari’s Amalis, to which we limited our research study, which was in what is specific to praise, some cases of the relative pronoun, cases of deleting the interrogative letter, and cases of (Ama) between the condition and the conjunction