A Conceptual Framework to Explain the Interface of Syntax-Semantics in Idiomatic Expressions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.9.2.P2.15Keywords:
Syntax-Semantics Interface, Idiomatic Expressions, Compositionality, Non-Compositionality, Generative GrammarAbstract
This research proposes a conceptual framework for accounts of the syntax-semantics interface within idiomatic expressions, whose often non-compositional nature poses a substantial challenge to classical linguistic theory that is predicated on a meaning composition postulate based on word meaning and syntactic structure. But a significant challenge remains for linguistic theory: no single framework provides an explanation for how syntactic composition interacts with non-literal meaning in idiomatic phrasing, particularly since idioms vary in their compositionality. This gap in theory makes idioms hard to analyze and interpret across languages, in which syntactic stiffness tends to coexist with semantic obscurity or metaphorical richness. In probing the intricate relationship between syntax and meaning, the present research seeks to present a broad theoretical framework that brings together insights from both generative grammar, construction grammar, and cognitive linguistics. The framework is proposed as being able to cover the various gradations of compositionality among the different idioms, from fully opaque through to partially transparent ones. The research sheds light on the processing and interpretation of the idiomatic expressions across languages, pointing to the necessity of both syntactic structure and metaphorical meaning for idiom understanding.
References
Baker, M. C. (1988). Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. University of Chicago Press.
Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1993). Idioms: Processing, structure, and interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris Publications.
Dąbrowska, A. (2018). A syntactic study of idioms: Psychological states in English and their constraints. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. https://www.cambridgescholars.com/product/978-1-5275-0616-9,
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. Basic Books.
Frege, G. (1892). On sense and reference. In P. Geach & M. Black (Eds.), Translating from the German (pp. 56-78). Basil Blackwell.
Gehrke, B., & McNally, L. (2018). Idioms and the syntax/semantics interface of descriptive content vs. reference. Linguistics, 57(4), 769–814. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0016
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.
Jackendoff, R. (2002). The architecture of the language faculty. MIT Press.
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press.
Kaal, A. (2011). The interaction of form and meaning in idiomatic expressions: Cognitive Linguistics and its implications for the study of idioms. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(2), 313-348.
Krennmayr, T. (2011). The meanings of idiomatic expressions: From syntactic structures to cultural contexts. Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
Montague, R. (1970). Universal grammar. Theoria, 36(1), 373-398.
Nediger, W. A. (2017). Unifying structure-building in human language: The minimalist syntax of idioms (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan). https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/138471/wnediger_1.pdf?sequence=1,
Nunberg, G., Sag, I. A., & Wasow, T. (1994). Idioms. Language, 70(3), 491-538.
Pollard, C., & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. University of Chicago Press.
Schäfer, R. (2008). Arguments and adjuncts at the syntax-semantics interface (Master’s thesis). Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
