The Collapse of Morality and Power Abuse in Robert Penn Warren's All the King's Men (1946)

Authors

  • Rekan Muqtadir Azeez College of Languages, Salahuddin University
  • Dr. Sirwan Abdukarim Ali Collage of Languages, Salahuddin University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.9.2.20

Keywords:

Power abuse, Moral collapse, Class conflict, Hegemony, Marxist criticism

Abstract

This paper attempts to offers a comprehensive overview of the socio-political argument about interconnection of power abuse, moral collapse, and class conflict as represented in Robert Penn Warren's All the King's Men (1946). This study at examining Warren's novel with the corrupting influence of power abuse through the moral variation presented by the central character, Willie Stark. Framed through theoretical lenses of Marxist literary criticism and Gramsci’s theory of Hegemony, this study examines the populist politician whose moral collapse reflects the broader deterioration of personal and societal values. The novel tries to describe the intersection of personal ambition and political hegemony, signifying the manipulation of power and populist ideology. This study critically examines the complications around political life and its ethical consequences to situate All the King's Men within the context of broader literary composition, highlighting the exploration of power dynamics and social structures. The study concludes that Warren’s novel remains significant to contemporary debates by disclosing how specific factors as corruption within power structures, the manipulation of public narratives and prioritizing political expediency over moral principles lead to both personal and societal collapse. These forces undermine genuine human values and replace them with empty political promises, highlighting the important contrast between rigid ideological thinking and pragmatic approaches to governance. 

References

Berryhill, B. (2000). Politics and Philosophy in the in the Writings Robert Penn Warren. [Online] Available at: https://repository.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/7338/?utm_source=repository.lsu.edu%2Fgradschool_disstheses%2F7338&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages [Accessed 06 11 2024].

Blotner, J. (1997). Robert Penn Warren: A Biography. (1st ed.), Random House.

Bressler, C. E. (2011). Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. (5th ed.), Pearson Education.

Butts, L., (2023). Heroes with a Hundred Names: Mythology and Folklore in the Early Fiction of Robert Penn Warren. (1st ed.), McFarland, Incorporated, Publishers.

Cullick, J. S., (2018). Robert Penn Warren's All the King's Men: A Reader's Companion. (1st ed.), University Press of Kentucky.

Dobie, A. B. (2012). Theory into Practice: An Introduction to Literary Criticism. (3rd ed.), Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Flora, J. M. & Vogel, A. (eds.) (2006). Southern Writers: A New Biographical Dictionary. (1st ed.) Baton Rouge: LSU Press.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Edited and Translated by Q. Hoare and G. Nowell Smith (1978). (5th ed.), International Publishers.

Grimshaw, J. A. (2001). Understanding Robert Penn Warren. (1st ed.), University of South Carolina Press.

Hendricks, R and Perkins, J.A. (eds.) (2013). Selected Letters of Robert Penn Warren: Toward Sunset, at a Great Height, 1980-1989. (1st ed.) LSU Press.

Hoare, G. and Sperber, N. (2016). An Introduction to Antonio Gramsci: His Life, Thought and Legacy. (1st ed.), Bloomsbury Academic.

Jones, S. (2006). Antonio Gramsci. (1st ed.), Routledge.

Lane, J. H. (2001). The Stark Regime and American Democracy: A Political Interpretation of Robert Penn Warren's All the King's Men. American Political Science Review, 95(4), pp. 811-828.

Madden, D. (ed.) (2000). The Legacy of Robert Penn Warren. (1st ed.), LSU Press.

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1845). The German Ideology. Edited and Introduced by C.J. Arthur (1970). (1st ed.), Lawrence & Wishart.

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1848/2008). Manifesto of the Communist Party. Translated by S. Moor With annotations by F. Engels 1888, Open Source Socialist Publishing

Mazlish, B. (1984). The meaning of Karl Marx. (1st ed.), Oxford University Press.

Millichap, J., (2023). Robert Penn Warren, David Milch, and the Literary Contexts of Deadwood. In: M. R. Winchell, (ed.) Robert Penn Warren: Genius Loves Company. Clemson University Press.

Millichap, J. R., (2021). Robert Penn Warren, Shadowy Autobiography, and Other Makers of American Literature. (1st ed.), University of Tennessee Press.

Moon, B. (1999). Literary Terms: A Practical Glossary (The Ncte Chalkface Series). (1st ed.), National Council of Teachers of English.

Nakadate, N. (ed.) (1981). Robert Penn Warren: Critical Perspectives. (1st ed.), University Press of Kentucky.

Runyon, R. (1990). The taciturn text: the fiction of Robert Penn Warren. (1st ed.), Ohio State University Press.

Ruppersburg, H. (1990). Robert Penn Warren and the American imagination. (1st ed.), University of Georgia Press.

Scotchie, J., (2023). Warren, Bellow, and the Changing Tides. In: M. R. Winchell, (ed.) Robert Penn Warren: Genius Loves Company. Clemson University Press.

Smith, M. C. (2022). All the King’s Men: Power Corrupts. In: Lyons J. D. (ed). History and Government Faculty Publications. DegitalCommons@Cedarville. [Online] Available at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/history_and_government_publications/350/ [ Accessed 04 05 2024]

Turner, D. C., (2023). Modern Primitives: Mergings in the poetry of Robert Pen Warren and James Dickey. In: M. R. Winchell, (ed.) Robert Penn Warren: Genius Loves Company. Clemson University Press.

Tyson, L., (2006). Critical Theory Today (A user-friendly guide). (3rd ed.), Routledge.

Wainwright, J., (2010). On Gramsci's 'conceptions of the world'. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(4), pp. 507-521

Warren, R. P. (1946). All the King's Men. Restored ed. (2002). (1st Harvest ed.), Harcourt.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Azeez, R. M., & Ali, S. A. (2025). The Collapse of Morality and Power Abuse in Robert Penn Warren’s All the King’s Men (1946). JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE STUDIES, 9(2), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.9.2.20