The Doll’s House as a Sickroom: Patriarchy, Moral Corruption, and Female Identity

Authors

  • Lect. Zainab Ismat Safa Eldeen Alnaftchi (Ph. D.) English Department, College of Education for Humanities, University of Kirkuk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.10.2.P2.17

Abstract

 

At the end of the nineteenth century, Henrik Ibsen, the major Norwegian playwright and ‘the father of prose drama’, challenged the conventions of bourgeois society by exposing the hidden illnesses of its institutions. His play A Doll’s House exposes the hidden moral “illnesses” of nineteenth-century patriarchal society by intertwining hereditary disease with social corruption. This study argues that the play uses the metaphor of hereditary illness not to condemn women but to reveal how patriarchy pathologises them. While Dr Rank’s inherited tuberculosis provokes sympathy and Krogstad’s moral weakness is framed as socially conditioned, Nora is judged far more harshly: her supposed “inheritance” of her father’s flaws is treated as proof of inherent female corruption. Drawing on feminist theory, this study argues that such framing reflects a gendered double standard in which men’s faults are medicalised, whereas women’s independence is cast as moral danger. Nora’s final rejection of the “doll” identity eventually unmasks patriarchy, not women, as the true hereditary disease. Through this metaphor, Ibsen presents the social construction of femininity and the oppressive structures that define women as inherently flawed.

References

Abbotson, S. W. (2003). Thematic guide to modern drama. Greenwood Press.

Atzmon, G. (2020). Hereditary diseases. Hereditary Genetics: Current Research.

Batool, F. Z. (2019). A Study of Ibsen's treatment of hereditary disease as a symbol of moral corruption with special reference to 'A Doll's House', 'Ghosts', and 'The Wild Duck'. Journal of International Academic Research for Multidisciplinary, 7(5), 116-157.

Beauvoir, S. d. (1956). The second sex. (H. M. Parshley, Trans.) Jonathan Cape.

Berzenji, L. (2008). Margaret Atwood’s The edible woman: A feminist reading. Kirkuk University Journal: Humanity Studies, 4(2), 1-16.

Butler, J. (1999). Identity, gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

Gaikwad, J. J. (2016). The Portrayal of Nora in Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House: An emancipation of Women. Journal of the English Liberator Society, 1(2), 111-117.

Goldman, E. (1914). The social significance of the Modern Drama. The Gorham Press.

Haugen, E. (1979). Ibsen's Drama: Author to audience. The University of Minnesota Press.

Ibsen, H. (2005). Four great plays: A Doll’s House, The Wild Duck, Hedda Gabler, The Master Builder. Pocket Books.

Innes, C. (2000). A sourcebook on naturalist theatre. Routledge.

Johnsen, W. A. (2003). Violence and modernism: Ibsen, Joyce, and Woolf. University Press of Florida.

Lall, R. (2006). Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House: A critical study. Rama Brothers.

Luckhurst, M. (2006). A companion to modern British and Irish drama, 1880-2005. Blackwell.

Millett, K. (2000). Sexual politics. University of Illinois Press.

Moi, T. (2006). Henrik Ibsen and the birth of modernism: Art, theater, philosophy. Oxford University Press.

Moosa, N. K. and T. S. Noori. (2008). Man and society in Arthur Miller's A view from the bridge. Kirkuk University Journal: Humanity Studies, 3(2), 1-17.

Sturman, M. (1965). Ibsen's A Doll's House & Hedda Gabler. John Wiley & Sons.

Templeton, J. (1989, January 1). The "Doll House" Backlash: Criticism, feminism, and Ibsen. PMLA, 104(1), 28-40.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Ismat Alnaftchi, Z. (2026). The Doll’s House as a Sickroom: Patriarchy, Moral Corruption, and Female Identity . JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE STUDIES, 10(2, Part 2), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.10.2.P2.17