Negotiating Power: Speech Acts Shaping Power Dynamics in William Faulkner’s “Barn Burning”

Authors

  • Asst. Prof. Dr. Rana Abdul Settar Abid Department of English, College of Education for Human Sciences, University of Basrah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.10.2.P1.14

Keywords:

Speech Act Theory, Power dynamics, Authority and resistance, Discourse analysis, Barn Burning

Abstract

The present study examines the linguistic representation of struggle in William Faulkner’s “Barn Burning” through the application of speech act theory. It aims to complement and support the findings of previous studies that have explored the theme of power dynamics and struggle between characters in this work of fiction from psychological, historical, and socio-economic perspectives, but not from a linguistic one. The results reveal that directive and assertive speech acts are predominately used by Abner Snopes, the father, reflecting his authoritarian and coercive character. In contrast, Sarty Snopes, the younger son, employs various types of speech acts, revealing his character transformation throughout the story. The study also investigates silence as a form of speech acts, demonstrating that characters have used it to achieve the same communicative purposes as spoken language. The study concludes that power dynamics in literary discourse, as represented in Faulkner’s “Barn Burning”, can be reflected linguistically in the same way they are portrayed thematically.

References

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.

Bollobás, E., (1980). Speech Acts in Literature. Angol Filológiai Tanulmányok / Hungarian Studies in English, Vol. 13, pp. 39-47.

Faulkner, W., (1939). Barn Burning. http://pdcrodas.webs.ull.es/naturalismo/FaulknerBarnBurning.pdf

Fowler, V. C., (1981). Faulkner’s “Barn Burning”: Sarty’s Conflict Reconsidered. CLA Journal, Vol 24, No. 4, pp: 513-521.

Godden, R., (1995). William Faulkner, “Barn Burning” and the Second Reconstruction. Irish Journal of American Studies, Vol. 4, pp: 23-48.

Kartiganer, D. M., (1979). The Fragile Thread: The Meaning of Form in Faulkner's Novels. University of Massachusetts Press.

Kirchdorfer, UIf., (2014). Don’t Do It on My Carpet: The Humor of William Faulkner’s “Barn Burning”. American Studies in Scandinavian, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp: 3-15. http://rauli.cbs.dk/index.php/assc/article/view/5133.

Pratt, M. L. (1977). Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse. Indiana University Press.

Rio-Jelliffe, R.,(1994). The Language of Time in Fiction: A Model in Faulkner’s “Barn Burning”. The Journal of Narrative Technique, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp:98-113.

Săftoiu, R., (2018). To Speak or not to Speak. Notes on Silence as a Dialogic Speech Act. RRL, LXIII, 1–2, p. 115–131

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Toolan, M., (2016). Making Sense of Narrative Text: Situation, Repetition, and Picturing in the Reading of Short Stories. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Abdul Settar Abid, R. (2026). Negotiating Power: Speech Acts Shaping Power Dynamics in William Faulkner’s “Barn Burning”. JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE STUDIES, 10(2, Part 1), 266–290. https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.10.2.P1.14