Power, Persuasion, and Fallacy: A Critical-Pragmatic Analysis of Argumentative Fallacies in the Trump–Zelenskyy Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.10.2.P2.14Abstract
This study provides a critical-pragmatic analysis of fallacious argumentation in the February 28, 2025 Oval Office discourse between U.S. President Donald Trump, Vice President J.D. Vance, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The encounter reveals how fallacies function not merely as reasoning flaws, but as strategic linguistic tools for discursive domination. Drawing on Walton’s pragmatic theory of fallacy, the pragma-dialectical model, and CDA, the research examines how ad hominem attacks, straw man arguments, false dilemmas, and appeals to emotion are employed to assert control, constrain responses, and construct ideological binaries.
The study adopts a qualitative-critical approach. It analyzes a transcribed ten-minute segment of the meeting using speech act theory, Gricean implicature, and CDA principles. The findings demonstrate that Trump and Vance deploy fallacious reasoning to construct conversational contexts and coerce Zelenskyy into performative compliance. In contrast, Zelenskyy uses hedging, politeness, and discursive mitigation as resistance strategies to preserve face and diplomatic balance.
References
Al-Haboobi, Z. R. H., & Al-Rikabi, A. A. A. (2022). The (Im)politeness of political fallacies: A pragmatic analysis. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(Special Issue), 705–719.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Capone, A. (2010). Perspectives on language use and pragmatics. Peter Lang.
Chilton, P., & Schaffner, C. (1997). Discourse and politics. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 206–231). Sage.
El Hadi, T. (2021). Emotional fallacies in public discourse: A proposed perspective for research. Misr University Journal for Humanities, 1(1), 1–15.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. Boston: Addison Wesley.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Hamblin, C. L. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen.
Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. Harlow, England: Longman.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2005). War rhetoric of a little ally: Political implicatures and Aznar’s legitimatization of the war in Iraq. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(1), 65–91.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359–383.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan.
Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge University Press.
Van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2002). Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance. In F. H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 131–159). Kluwer Academic.
van Eemeren, FH; Garssen, B.; Meuffels, B. (2015). The Disguised Ad Baculum Fallacy Empirically Investigated: Strategic Maneuvering With Threats . AmsterdamSic Sat. ISBN 978-90-361-0450-0 . Retrieved November 7, 2024 .
Walton, D. (1995). A pragmatic theory of fallacy. University of Alabama Press.
Walton, D. (2000). Scare tactics: Arguments that appeal to fear and threats. Springer.
Walton, D. (2006). Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge University Press.
Walton, D. (2007). Media argumentation: Dialectic, persuasion and rhetoric. Cambridge University Press.
Walton, D. (2010). Why fallacies appear to be better arguments than they are. Informal Logic, 30(2), 159–184.
Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage.
Wodak, R., & Reisigl, M. (2001). Discourse and racism. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 372–397). Blackwell.
