A Pragmatic Analysis of Reactions to Rumors on COVID-19 in Iraq
Riyadh Ameen Husein
Ministry of Education / Ninawa Fine Arts Institute
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.9.1.14
Keywords: Rumor, Speech acts, Impoliteness, Communication
Abstract
A rumor is an unverified piece of information that often appear during general health crisis, conflict or war. Studying pragmatic functions of rumors on COVID-19 and vaccination are almost rare. Speech acts, which are a part of pragmatics, mean to perform actions by uttering words or phrases in a certain context. This study investigates how media rumors are functioning as pragmatic messages that influence the modern communication. Additionally, an attention is paid as well to the strategies of impoliteness that appear by the commenters as response to the rumor posted. This research hypothesizes that people use less impoliteness strategies as a reaction to rumor on general health. The second hypothesis assumes that people use only “requesting” as a form of “directive speech act” when the subject matter is about general health.
References
Austin, J.L. (1975). "How to Do Things With Words." 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press
Arkaitz Zubiaga and Heng Ji. (2014). Tweet, but verify: epistemic study of information verification on Twitter. Social Network Analysis and Mining; 4(1):1–12. doi: 10.1007/s13278-014-0163-y
Arkaitz Zubiaga et al., (2018). Detection and Resolution of Rumours in Social Media: A Survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 51, 2, Article 32 (2018), 36 pages.
Bousfield, Derek (2008). Impoliteness in Interaction. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bach, K. and R. M. Harnish, (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
BBC News: AP Twitter account hacked in fake’White House blasts’ post;. Accessed: 2016-02-25. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-21508660
Culpeper, Jonathan, (1996). Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349-367.
Culpeper, Jonathan (2011a). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge University Press, New York
Culpeper. J, Bousfield. D and Wichmann. A, (2003). Impoliteness Revisited: with Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (2003) 1545–1579.
DiFonzo, N. and Bordia, P. (2007) Rumor Psychology: Social and Organizational Approaches. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Jon Bugge, (2017). Rumour has it: A Practice Guide to Working with Rumours. Available at: http://www.cdacnetwork.org/tools-and-resources/i/20170613105104-5v7pb
Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford University Press.
Leech, G. (1996). Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.
Robert, H. Knapp. (1944). A psychology of rumor. Public Opinion Quarterly. 8, 1 (1944), 22–37.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J.R. (1971) ‘What is a speech act?’, in J.R. Searle (ed.) The Philosophy ofLanguage, Oxford,OxfordUniversityPress, pp.44–6.Originally inBlack,M.(ed.) (1965) Philosophy in America, London, Allen & Unwin, pp.221–39. Edited as indicated.
Wilson, Robert, Samuel Gosling and Lindsay Graham. (2012). ‗A review of Facebook research in the social sciences‘. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7 (3): 203–220
Yule, G. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
