University Instructors' Levels of Use of Open Educational Resources and the Factors that Influenced their Usage

Ali Sabah Jameel

Department of English, College of Arts, University of Anbar

Nabeel Jassim Mohammed

Department of Sociology, College of Arts, University of Anbar

Maha Majeed Anber

Department of English ,College of Education for Humanities, University of Anbar

Abdul-Razzaq Hussein Saleh

Deanship office, College of Arts, University of Anbar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.8.12.2.11

Keywords: OERs, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and attitudes


Abstract

The study aims to reveal the university instructors' level of use of the kinds of Open Educational Resources (OERs) and their usage in teaching and for academic purposes too, also to reveal the factors that encourage them to use the OERs. The study's design is quantitative and qualitative data. The data were gathered via a questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. The participants were 52 university instructors from the Department of English and the Department of Sociology at the College of Arts, and the College of Education for Humanities, University of Anbar. The results revealed that the instructors' level of use of OERs was low. The most used OERs were The Multimedia Resources, Online dictionaries, and the Spell Checkers. The factors that affect using OERs were the attitude, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived behavioral control, satisfaction, and perceived pleasure. It can be inferred that the instructors do not use the most common OERs. They used Online dictionaries and Spell Checkers which is important for all EFL instructors. The instructors used the OERs based on several factors, they use the OERs which have positive attitude, useful for their teaching, ease of use, also they used the OERs that they feel they have behavioral control, satisfaction also was an important factor to use OERs which provide satisfaction atmosphere, and finally, they used the OERs which they perceived pleasure when they use them.


References

Adil, H. M., Ali, S., Sultan, M., Ashiq, M., & Rafiq, M. (2024). Open education resources’ benefits and challenges in the academic world: A systematic review. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 73(3), 274–291.

Almadhady, AA. (2024). Utilizing mobile applications for English language learning by EFL learners. J Almaarif Univ Coll. ;35(1).

Alyoussef, I. Y., & Omer, O. M. A. (2023). Investigating student satisfaction and adoption of technology-enhanced learning to improve educational outcomes in Saudi higher education. Sustainability, 15(19), 14617.

Anber, M., & Jameel, A. (2020). Measuring University Of Anbar EFL Students' Awareness of Emoji Faces in WhatsApp and their Implementations. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 47(2).‏

Apasieva, T. J., Cabuleva, K., & Mitreva, M. (2020). Theory of planned behavior: Personal attitude and perceived behavioral control as key determinants in creation of entrepreneurial societies and social inclusion of young people. Balkan Social Science Review, 15(15), 275-297.‏

Asghar, F., Mahmood, S., Iqbal Khan, K., Gohar Qureshi, M., & Fakhri, M. (2022). Eminence of leader humility for follower creativity during COVID-19: The role of self-efficacy and proactive personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 790517.

Atenas, J., Ebner, M., Ehler, U. D., Nascimbeni, F., & Schön, S. (2024). An introduction to open educational resources and their implementation in higher education worldwide. Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society, 4(4).

Bajaj, P., Khan, A., Tabash, M. I., & Anagreh, S. (2021). Teachers’ intention to continue the use of online teaching tools post COVID-19. Cogent Education, 8(1), 2002130.

Bliss, T. J., & Smith, M. (2017). A brief history of open educational resources. Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science, 9-27.‏

Bowker, L. (2021). Translating for Canada, eh? Developing open educational resources to support localization into Canadian English and French. Journal of Internationalization and Localization, 8(2), 156–164.

Braßler, M. (2024). Students’ digital competence development in the production of open educational resources in education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 16(4), 1674.

Buehler, C. (2023). Reconnecting professional development: A connectivist approach to shared learning through the development of social presence in virtual learning networks (Doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University.

Chan, T., Cheung, C., & Zach, W. (2017). The state of online impulse-buying research: A literature analysis. Information & Management, 54(2), 204–217.

Cheung, S. K. (2018). Perceived usefulness of open educational resources between full-time and distance-learning students. In Blended Learning. Enhancing Learning Success: 11th International Conference, ICBL 2018, Osaka, Japan, July 31–August 2, 2018, Proceedings 11 (pp. 357–367). Springer International Publishing.

Cheung, S. K. (2021). Implication on perceived usefulness of open educational resources after a rapid switch to online learning mode. In Blended Learning: Re-thinking and Re-defining the Learning Process. 14th International Conference, ICBL 2021, Nagoya, Japan, August 10–13, 2021, Proceedings 14 (pp. 298-308). Springer International Publishing.‏

Ebijuwa, A. S. (2018). Gender differentiation and perceived ease of usage of electronic resources by university students in selected private universities in Nigeria. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 55(3), 117-127.‏

Esan, A. O., Ifijeh, B. A., & Chanomi, P. O. (2024). Perceived Usefulness and Use of Open Educational Resources among Postgraduate Students in Federal Universities in South-West, Nigeria. Communicate: Journal of Library and Information Science, 26(1), 195-209.‏

Habeeb, L. S., & Jameel, A. S. (2023). Investigating the Translation Strategies that English Language Students' Utilized in Translation Diverse Topics. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 50(6), 1-14.‏

Hamzah, A. (2024). The effect of using YouTube in raising first intermediate grade EFL students’ level of speaking skill. Nasaq, 41(6).

Huang, F., Teo, T., & Scherer, R. (2022). Investigating the antecedents of university students’ perceived ease of using the Internet for learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(6), 1060–1076.

Jaggars, S. S., Folk, A. L., & Mullins, D. (2018). Understanding students’ satisfaction with OERs as course materials. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 19(1), 66-74.‏

Jameel, A. S. (2023). The Role of Self-Monitoring Strategies in Developing Students’ Speaking Performances via Google Workspace. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 50(6), 25-34.‏

Jameel, AS. (2022).The effects of story mapping and hortatory exposition techniques on students’ compositions. Education Research International, 2022(1):4300692.

Jameela, T. (2014). Open educational resources in teacher education: A survey of instructional methods used by faculties of training colleges. Excellence International Journal of Education and Research (Multi-Subject Journal), 2(1), 1–12.

Jomaa, NJ, Kamal, MN. (2023). Perspectives of students and teachers towards developing speaking skills by using technology among EFL Iraqi students. In: Integrating TPACK and CALL in English Language Teaching. IGI Global. p. 153-173.

Kazoka, J. E., & Mwantimwa, K. (2019). Perceived usefulness and ease of use of Web 2.0 tools in university teaching and learning in Tanzania. University of Dar es Salaam Library Journal, 14(2), 19-37.‏

Khayat, ASJA. (2023). The role of some instructional tools in facilitating students' pronunciation: A case study. J Univ Anbar Humanit; 20(3).

Korableva, O., Durand, T., Kalimullina, O., & Stepanova, I. (2019, March). Studying user satisfaction with the MOOC platform interfaces using the example of coursera and open education platforms. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Big Data and Education (pp. 26-30).‏

Lin, Y. C., Liu, G. Y., Chang, C. Y., Lin, C. F., Huang, C. Y., Chen, L. W., & Yeh, T. K. (2021). Perceived behavioral control as a mediator between attitudes and intentions toward marine responsible environmental behavior. Water, 13(5), 580.‏

Mohammed T. (2023). The impact of teaching using the Google Classroom platform on the achievement of the Iraqi EFL students at University of Missan. East J Lang Linguist Lit., 4(1):18-35.

Mohammed, N., & Anas, E. (2020). Interdisciplinary in social sciences: the social service in Iraq as a model. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 47(2).‏

Nilashi, M., Abumalloh, R. A., Zibarzani, M., Samad, S., Zogaan, W. A., Ismail, M. Y., & Akib, N. A. M. (2022). What factors influence students satisfaction in massive open online courses? Findings from user-generated content using educational data mining. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9401-9435.‏

Olivier, J., & Rambow, A. (2023). Contextualising open educational resources in higher education. In Open educational resources in higher education: A global perspective (pp. 1–13). Springer Nature Singapore.

Otto, D. (2021). Driven by emotions! The effect of attitudes on intention and behaviour regarding open educational resources (OER). Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2021(1).

Ouahib, S., El Kharki, K., Bendaoud, R., Burgos, D., & Berrada, K. (2022). Open educational resources as a global solution for wider class courses. In Pedagogy, didactics and educational technologies: Research experiences and outcomes in enhanced learning and teaching at Cadi Ayyad University (pp. 31–48). Springer Nature Singapore.

Prasad, D., & Usagawa, T. (2014). Towards development of OER derived custom-built open textbooks: A baseline survey of university teachers at the University of the South Pacific. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(4), 226–247.

Riley, E., & Carmack, J. K. (2020). Adopting open educational resources in a nursing informatics course: an evaluation of student performance and course satisfaction. Nurse Educator, 45(6), 336-338.‏

Schön, S., & Ebner, M. (2020). Open educational resources in Austria. Current state of open educational resources in the “belt and road” countries, 17-33.‏

Shawaqfeh, A. T., Jameel, A. S., Al-Adwan, L. A. Y., & Khasawneh, M. A. S. (2024). Interaction as a mechanism to enhance English language proficiency in the classroom. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(1), 229-234.‏

Shukr, HY, Jameel, TA. (2022). Digital technology in English language teaching and learning. NTU J Adm Hum Sci (JAHS); 2(2):164-177.

Sommer, M., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Kohnen, A., & Hampton, J. (2022). Instructional elements in an online information literacy open educational resource (OER) and their influence on learner achievement, satisfaction and self-efficacy. Journal of Information Literacy, 16(1), 70–90.

Talabani, HS, Jumaa, IH. (2024). A review of various machine learning techniques and its application on IoT and cloud computing. Tikrit J Pure Sci.;29(1):185-195.

Tang, H. (2020). A qualitative inquiry of K–12 teachers’ experience with open educational practices: Perceived benefits and barriers of implementing open educational resources. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 211–229.

Tang, H., Lin, Y. J., & Qian, Y. (2020). Understanding K–12 teachers’ intention to adopt open educational resources: A mixed methods inquiry. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2558–2572.

Tipton, J. (2020). Faculty use of open educational resources: Attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy as behavioral predictors (Doctoral dissertation). University of Mississippi.

Tshabalala, T. (2020). Students’ attitudes to open educational resources (OERs). International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 7(3), 9.

UNESCO. Open Educational Resources [Internet]. (2024). [cited year month day]. Available from: https://www.unesco.org/en/open-educational-resources.

UNESCO. Recommendation on Open Educational Resources (OER) [Internet]. (2019 Nov 25). [cited year month day]. Available from: https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-open-educational-resources-oer?hub=785

Villanueva, L. A. S., & Dolom, M. A. C. (2018). Adoption of open educational resources among teachers in a rural public high school in the Philippines.

Walz, A. R. (2018). Remix and share: Teaching others to navigate copyright issues in open education & open licensing contexts.

Wiley, D., Bliss, T. J., & McEwen, M. (2014). Open educational resources: A review of the literature. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 781-789.‏

Yusliza, M., Saputra, J., Fawehinmi, O., Mat, N., & Mohamed, M. (2020). The mediating role of justification on the relationship of subjective norms, perceived behavioral control and attitude on intention to cheat among students. Management science letters, 10(16), 3767-3776.‏

Zogheib, B., Rabaa’i, A., Zogheib, S., & Elsaheli, A. (2015). University student perceptions of technology use in mathematics learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14.