4th Year EFL Iraqi Leaners' Pragmatic Failure in Polysemy
Ali Ershad Rushdi
Tikrit University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.8.10.7
Keywords: Pragmatic-linguistic failure (PLF), socio-pragmatic failure (SPF), polysemy, homonymy, pragmatic competence
Abstract
This paper is an endeavor to identify the failure of EFL Iraqi learners when they are asked to realize the meaning of polysemous words in their context. The model of analysis is Thomas's (1983) "pragmatic failure"(PF). Polysemous words have different meanings. There are two kinds of polysemy: semantic and pragmatic polysemy. The important part of the study at hand is pragmatic polysemy, which is the pragmatic meaning that results from polysemous words through the intentionality of the speakers, as these words leave a free space for their speakers to pick the meaning they want to communicate. Besides, these meanings may mingle on the part of the listeners in native language speakers and listeners, so polysemous words would, of course, constitute a problem for the learners of English. Again, it is believed that the lack of both linguistic and pragmatic competence is the result of this pragmatic failure.
References
………… (2022): ‘Polysemy: Pragmatics and sense conventions’. In: Mind & Language. 1–26.
Brown, F.G. (1983): Principles of Education and Psychological Testing. New York: Wiley.
Carston R. (2002): Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. London: Blackwell Publishing.
Crystal D. (2008): A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. London: Blackwell Publishing.
Eble, R. I. (1972): Essentials of Education Measurement. New York: Prentice Hall.
Fraser B. (2010): Pragmatic Competence: The Case of Hedging. In: Kalterbӧck, Mihatseh, and Schneider. New Approaches to Hedging. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Leech G (1983): Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman Ltd.
Levinson, S. C. (1983): Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons J (1977a): Semantics Vol I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons J (1977b): Semantics Vol II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons J (1995): Linguistic Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mahmoud, H. and Al-Thalab, H. (2024): A Socio-Cognitive Analysis of the Self/other Representation in Bush’s Speech. In: Journal of Language Studies. Available on: http://jls.tu.edu.iq/
Malinowski B. (1923): The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages, in C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards (eds), The Meaning of Meaning New York: Harcourts, Brace, and Company.
Mey J. (2001): Pragmatics: An Introduction 2nd (ed). London: Blackwell Publishing.
Namiq, M. and Ali, H. (2024): A Cognitive Study of Drink Expressions in English Proverbs. In: Journal of Language Studies. Available on: http://jls.tu.edu.iq/
Rushdi, A., Ahmed, S. and Ismael, W. (2023): ‘EFL Iraqi Learners’ Pragmatic Failure in Animal Idiomatic Expression’. In: World Journal of English Language. Vol. 13, No. 2
Sperber D. and Wilson D. (1995): Relevance: Communication and Cognition. London: Blackwell Publishing.
Thomas J. (1983): Cross-cultural Pragmatic Failure. In: Applied Linguistics.
Yule G. (1996): Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
