The way Arabs contradicts the rules of assimilation to Differentiate in semantic signals

Sarah Jubair Muhammad

College of Human Education / University of Anbar

Atheer Tariq Noman

College of Islamic Sciences / University of Anbar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/jls.6.2.22

Keywords: assimilation, violation, significance, analogy


Abstract

This research is concerned with the study the subject of assimilation for the sake of meaning within data that differs from rules analogy. A set of laws executes this process including the prevention of the assimilation of similar letters, and the prevention of the assimilation of close ones to differentiate in significance. This study deals with a number of issues. Firstly, some confusion and overlapping in the meaning as well as mentioning the analogy known to the Arabs. Then, it clarifies the source of disagreement, and explaining the reason for this violation. The meaning in any language represents the linguistic features. The present research consists of two axes: the first seeks to demonstrate the overlapping of semantics caused by the assimilation of the two similar letters. The second one showed the Arabs’ violation of their analogy by assimilating of the two convergent letters, and that this The violation was for semantic differentiation